
ray johnson to robert warner, reprinted in esopus 16
i’ve spent the past few nights reading the collected correspondence of ray johnson, an artist whose best work was done in the mail. johnson’s letters are always funny and sometimes sad. several of his them are stamped BRUE EYES CRUB. several are stamped with snakes. several of them mention a mythical place called NIPPLE BEACH.
in 1995, he swam out into sag harbor and drowned himself. before that, he lived as a semi-recluse, dealing with gallerists and other artists via letters, almost exclusively. before that, he was friends with warhol, studied with john cage & merce cunningham, was semi-responsible for developing the concept of the pop-art college, and had what otherwise might’ve been construed as a fairly productive artist’s life c. the late 1950s and early 1960s.
*
i rarely send mail anymore. i rarely get it, either. i don’t like romanticizing outmoded technology, especially when the technology is essentially inconvenient, but reading johnson’s letters has made me think a lot about the power of getting a letter in the mail, holding it your hand, and registering the fact that someone has 1. taken time in their day to think about you, 2. taken out a piece of paper (not a household item anymore) 3. written something on the paper—for you!, 4. put the paper in an envelope (also not a household item anymore) and 5. put a stamp on the envelope. their spit is on that envelope. their spit might even be on that stamp. it all takes time, and time is always at a premium. in the face of overwhelming mortality, the amount of time we spend on each other is as good a measure of love as i can think of.
*
i’ve been thinking lately about the idea of ambition and focus— specifically how distracting they are. i’m indulging in side projects. go ahead and put all your eggs in one basket, but then start laying something other than eggs. sometimes what appears to be off to the side is really the center— sometimes the things we feel less ambitious about or less focused on are where we end up really showing our talents or abilities. that’s what i can learn from johnson, at least: that assigning greater importance to a certain kind of work (your magnum opus, your soul) is to ignore the potential for beauty and insight in all the weird little places you spend your time. it’s life as cutting-room footage; life as marginalia.
*
johnson was a buddhist, i guess, and i’ve never been more convinced that people can actually be buddhists than when i read his letters. if they were all there was, fine— they’re all there needs to be. they’re it. nipple beach. i peed your name on a blue buoy. what’s a grander, more profound, more permanent and more universal statement than to reject grandiosity, profundity, permanence, and universality? none i can think of. it’s bob’s name he pees. just bob’s. and then the pee washes away and the buoy remains, bobbing.
(by way of further reading, here’s a very thoughtful & extended piece in the nation about the ny correspondance school. spelling intentional.)
